Another smooshin' twister worthy of the great Milton Bradley!
and with *so many* melons bandied about, you've taken us all on quite the ascorbic acid trip!

Wonderfully meshed songs! creativity far above 555(maybe 714...LOL)

Splendid switcheroo. You might have even executed another fabled triple with Suite: Judy Blue-Eyes by Crosby, Stills, and Nash. But talk is cheap...and this is great action! ;D

Two songs that didn't make much sense to begin with are merged into something almost coherent. I continually admire your manipulations and wait to see what you'll come up with next. I think my brother actually liked "Judy in Disguise". Other than that, he is a much better man than I will ever be.

Excellent use of the two titles.

PS - don't know what's wrong, but the vote buttons have packed up. When I click on them I'm getting "error on page" in the bottom left.

What Andy said. I can't vote, and it's a shame since today's crop of twisted tales are quite nice. Enjoyed it TT, and here's some hallucinogenic 5's...virtual, if you will.

Feeling melon-choly? I'm not, after TT...... Smooshing on the Sly-- With class is!

TJC: Too bad the voting box is being a-score-bic today, eh? (Oh, T... ) Thanks for v/c = Vitamin C. (Stop it, I'm killing myself here! ;) :) ;)

Mark Scotti: Betcha' thought the turtle would miss the Quaalude™ reference, eh? TT *never* misses anything that's "lude", heh heh heh! (Oh, I'm in a mood tonight!)
          Thanks for clever, evocative v/c. (Nope, never did them either, but it was fun watching other kids in school bouncing off of walls, etc.)

Old Man Ribber: Unfortunately, DK the third song. Good idea, although the "extra" point here was that JIDWG was *specifically written* as a parody of LitSwD, as per intro. Thanks for v/c!

Patrick: TT has no clue what he'll come up with next, either... just does what the aliens tell him to. :) Thanks for v/c here, and normally, I wouldn't say the following, for fear of an onslaught of Ones. But with the voting box broken, what a perfect time! ....
          Each song in a smoosh is, in fact, a separate parody in and of itself, and theoretically, could - or should? -- be rated and commented upon as such, to give the author feedback (esp. if positive, heh!) and votes on each -- if you have the inclination to do so. I understand that time at work -- I mean, "lunch", is limited, but if smooshes produce half the v/c of two separate, unrelated songs, then there's some disincentive to do them. ... Wow, I sure hope that voting box doesn't get fixed anytime soon! (*Always* appreciate your v/c, wherever, whenever.)

Andy Primus: ChuckyG has been made aware of the broken voting box, at inthe00s. I assume he's on it. Appreciate the comment; but since the box doesn't work, could you say how you rate it? (Certainly, TT is not presumptuous enough to presume! ;) :-D

WarrenB: As above, we're all giving and getting a lot of virtual Fives today. I added some more information to your post at 00s to help ChuckyG diagnose the problem. Thanks for vv/c (virtual vote/comment).

Dr. Bunsin Honeydew: Got my burner burnin'! (Shell-a, shell-a burnin' love!) Definitely not feeling sad after that fine comment, and a melon-cauli(flower) salad. :-D Thanks!

A mashterpiece.

he he

John Barry, thanks.

Voting numbers don't matter much to me. I want to read what people think of what I've written

Right. you are. But *some* parodies continue to get v/c or views long after their day on the home page, (I'm still getting views on songs that I wrote on my first day, 1/30/2006, and votes/comments on songs from that year and forward) so if there's no comment at half of a smoosh, other readers won't see your comment, and if I refer back to it later, I might forget that you commented at the other half.

And I, too, would like to know what you think - *of the quality of each song as an individual parody*. I don't worry about votes, either, esp. thanks to the persistent unabomber, but generic comments at one half don't really tell me anything specific about the other half. Cheers.

Ann Hammond, must have cross-posted or something back on that day. Just saw this; sorry I missed your comment. Thanks!